Feminised Australian Women suck

Police: Woman, boy had sex at shelter
Both were staying at Brewster Center
By Alexis Huicochea
ARIZONA DAILY STAR

A 26-year-old woman was arrested on charges that she had sex with a 12-year-old boy while they were both living at a domestic violence shelter.
The arrest earlier this month came nearly two months after Tucson police received a report from the boy’s mother that a fellow resident at the Brewster Center Domestic Violence Services kissed and had sexual intercourse with her son, according to a police report.
The boy had been staying with his mother at the shelter for about a week when his mother left him Oct. 29 in the care of another resident while she went out, said Tucson police Detective Monica Prieto of the child sexual abuse unit.
That night, the boy and Veronica Bullock were seen kissing on the shelter’s playground, the police report said.
The witness told the boy’s mother about the kiss and she confronted her son, Prieto said.
According to the police report, the boy told his mother that he did kiss Bullock and that they had sex a few days earlier in the tunnel slide in the shelter’s playground.
The boy and Bullock did not know each other before their one-week stays at the shelter, Prieto said.
The Brewster Center provides shelter to women and children who are involved in domestic violence situations.
Bullock was not arrested until Dec. 13 when she was found at a Child Protective Services office, where she was visiting her two children, Prieto said.
The investigation took longer than usual because of the Brewster Center’s confidentiality agreement with its patients, Prieto said.
On Wednesday, the center’s program director, Julie Johnston, would not comment on the incident. She would say only that the center “adheres to federal and state confidentiality laws that protect survivors of domestic violence.”
Bullock was originally charged with two counts of sexual misconduct with a minor, one count of sexual abuse and one count of child molestation, Prieto said.
She has since been released from the Pima County jail. On Wednesday, the Pima County Attorney’s Office added a count of sexual misconduct with a minor, she said.
Prieto said the case shows the importance of taking these kind of accusations seriously.
“This is unusual,” Prieto said. “If this can happen at the Brewster Center, it can happen anywhere.”
Tucson police say anyone who may be a victim of sexual abuse should call 911.
Contact reporter Alexis Huicochea at 629-9412 or ahuicochea@azstarnet.com.

Women Who Kill Their own Children

From Charles Montaldo,

11 Women Are on Death Row for Killing Their Kids
The nation is always shocked by criminal cases such as Andrea Yates, a mother of five who methodically drowned all of her children in a bathtub then calmly called police, but mothers killing their children are more common than we might think.

According to the American Anthropological Association, more than 200 women kill their children in the United States each year. Three to five children a day are killed by their parents. Homicide is one of the leading causes of death of children under age four, yet we continue to “persist with the unrealistic view that this is rare behavior,” says Jill Korbin, expert on child abuse, who has studied mothers who killed their children.

We should detach from the idea of universal motherhood as natural and see it as a social response,” Nancy Scheper-Hughes, medical anthropologist says.

Prison Records
Discover the Truth about Anyone’s Prison and Criminal Records.
www.Search-Detective.net

Women in jail reported that no-one believed them when they said they wanted to kill their children. “There’s a collective denial even when mothers come right out and say, “I really shouldn’t be trusted with my kids.”

A look at the rolls of women who are currently on death row, and the crimes that put them there, shows that women who kill their children are indeed not as rare as we would like to believe. Of the 49 women on death row, 11 killed children:

Patricia Blackmon was 29 years old when she killed her two-year-old adopted daughter in Dothan, AL in May 1999.

Debra Jean Milke was 25 when she killer her four-year-old son in Arizona in 1989.

Dora Luz Durenrostro killed her two daughters, age four and nine, and her son, age 8, when she was 34 years old in San Jacinto, California in 1994.

Caro Socorro was 42 years old when she killer her three sons, age five, eight and 11, in Santa Rosa Valley, California in 1999.

Susan Eubanks murdered her four sons, ages four, six, seven, and 14, in San Marcos, California, in 1996 when she was 33.

Caroline Young was 49 in Haywood, California when she killed her four-year-old granddaughter and six-year-old grandson.

Robin Lee Row was 35 years old when she killed her husband, her 10-year-old son and her eight-year-old daughter in Boise, Idaho in 1992.

Michelle Sue Tharp was 29 years old in Burgettstown, Pennsylvania when she killed her seven-year-old daughter.

Franic Elaine Newton was 21 when she murdered her husband, seven-year-old son and two-year-old daughter in Houston, Texas.

Darlie Lynn Routier was 26 in Rowlett, Texas when she killed her five-year-old son.

Teresa Michelle Lewis killer her 51-year-old husband and 26-year-old step son in Keeling, Virgina when she was 33 years old.

Korbin says there are usually clues that are obvious to those around parents who end up killing their children. “Prior to a homicide, lots of lay people know these men and women are having difficulty parenting. The public has to be better educated in recognizing how to intervene and how to support child abuse prevention,” she said in an AAA press release.

http://www.fredoneverything.net/

A Matter Of Allegiance
And Why One Might Wisely Withold It

May 29, 2005

I wish to propose a salubrious anarchy, a deliberate renunciation of fealty to country, society, and government, an assertion of independence from folly and moral decay. Permit me to offer a taxing political idea: When a society ceases to be worthy of support, it is reasonable to withdraw support. The time, I submit, has come.

Here I do not mean to urge crime or counsel treason, but to suggest quiet renunciation of the national disaster. Ask yourself how much of American life pleases you. The schools are run by fools to manufacture fools, government grows more intrusive by the day, and culture is determined by the triple cloacae of New York, Hollywood, and Washington. Freedom withers, not only in the ominous encroachment of police powers, but in the loss of control over schools, church, hiring, daily life. We are no longer our own. The United States is not the country we are told it is, and not the country it was.

How to escape? The beginning, and the most difficult, is a moral distancing. Those who care must disentangle themselves from the cobweb loyalties and factitious duties with which we have been unconsciously encumbered. From childhood we learn patriotism, that one must vote, that if our way is not perfect it is at least best, that we must support anything however bad because were were born in a particular place. Why?

Let me suggest that one owes loyalty to one’s family and friends, to common decency, and to nothing else. Render under Caesar what you must, keep what you can, and swear allegiance to nothing. Here I do not mean just the government, but the zeitgeist, the miasmic fetor of trashy culture, the desperate consumerism, the entire psychic odor of a society in decomposition.

Begin with things so fundamental as seldom to be reflected upon. For example, do not imagine that you are under an obligation to marry, or to have children, or to raise them as the government requires. Procreate if you choose, but only if you genuinely want to procreate. It is not your job to perpetuate a civilization that is daily less deserving of perpetuation.

But: never let the government have your children. Once they are had, your responsibility is to them. Teach them at home. Better yet, go abroad. Other countries do not force you to pay for an academically retrograde moral cesspool and then to drown your children in it. You might be astonished to know Argentina, for example.

Ask not what you can do for your country, but what it can do for you—you ought to get some of your taxes back.

Do not tie yourself to…anything. The price of freedom is poverty: freedom grows as your needs diminish. Less apothegmatically, if you believe that you need a vast house in a prestigious suburb, then you will need a lucrative job to pay for it. Having tied your psychic contentment to such an abode you will also believe that you need impressive cars and will therefore be tied to a retirement system and, bingo, the door of the trap falls. This, we are told, is the American Dream. I fear it has become so.

I lived years ago in a second-hand house trailer in the woods. I do not know what it cost, or would cost today, but perhaps fifteen thousand dollars. It was perfectly comfortable, warm in winter, air-conditioned in summer. Mornings were blessedly quiet unless you regard birdsong as noise. A brick barbecue provided a place to produce ribs and drink bourbon and water. A couple of companionable dogs rounded out the ensemble. They had the run of the trailer, as was right.

Now, living in a trailer is to the consumerist sensibility simply too degrading and so…I mean, my god, how could you face the neighbors? (There weren’t any.) But aside from damage to a servile dependent vanity, what is the drawback? A couple of hundred dollars buys a remarkably good stereo, music is free, libraries are good, and I for one am more comfortable in jeans and tee shirt than in Calvin and Klein trappings.

When your expenses are few, your susceptibility to economic serfdom is small. You do not need to work miserably in a pointless job for a boss you would gleefully strangle. Yes, you need money. The first principle is never to work in a job that you cannot afford to quit. This means avoiding any job with a retirement, of which you will become a prisoner. The second principle is to work at something portable that you can do independently and, preferably, without capital. Retirement? Save.

Dentistry pays well but requires pricey equipment, and it is not easy to build a clientele. An automotive mechanic is always in demand and the employer will usually provide the tools. Writing is a serviceable gig and can be done from anywhere. Many varieties of technicians readily find jobs. Remember that white-collar work, aside from tending strongly to entangle you, gets boring. Get a commercial-diving ticket, take a serious course in the repair of marine diesels, and spend your life in the Pacific.

Here again the obstacles are fear, inertia, and vanity. If you come from a family on the suburban-death track, the thought of being a mere mechanic or dive-shop owner or what have you may be disturbing. “Don’t I need a college degree to hold my head up?” Look at the universities, at what they have become, and ask the question again. (Anyway, respectable in whose eyes? Your own are the only ones that count.)

Finally, work the system. The government, if you let it, will take roughly half of your income, give much of it to useless bureaucrats, much to various forms of welfare, use much to bomb countries you may have no desire to bomb, and much to force upon you services, such as horrible schools, that you do not want. The central question regarding government is whether you can take more from it than it takes from you. It is much better to receive than to give. Live cheap, work only as much as you like, enjoy life, and keep your taxes down.

You will still read of the rot and running sores of a declining culture, but it will bother you less. These things are your problem only to the extent that you feel yourself to be part of the society that produces them. Don’t fight the government, as it will win. Don’t try to reform society, because you can’t. Laugh at it. Live well. Read much.

MEN GOING THEIR OWN WAY
The goal is to instill masculinity in men, femininity in women, and establish a limited government!

By instilling masculinity in men, we make men self-reliant, proud, and independent.

By instilling femininity in women, we make them nurturing, supporting, and responsible.

By working for a limited government, we are working for freedom and justice.

That women have other qualities is not interesting to men because we don’t need them! Femininity will be the price women pay for enjoying masculinity in men!

This is the aim of “Men Going Their Own Way”.

By holding this point of view, we are helping other men and, more importantly, we are helping boys grow up to become men.

This goal is to take away everybody’s “right” to vote on other people’s affairs thus rendering it impossible for political organisms and ideologies to impose their will on all people. It is not about reinstalling patriarchy or revoking female voting rights or making socialism illegal. It might have this as a side effect, but not directly, and not as a political ideology. Only the future will show what happens, and by going our own way we are preparing men and boys for that future.

It is important for men to have a practical approach to implementing our strategies.

PRIME STRATEGIES THAT COMPLIMENT OUR PRODUCT AND GOAL

We have 3 main strategies:

1. Instilling masculinity in men by:
Demanding respect for men
Serving as good male role models
Living independent lives
Fighting chivalry
2. Instilling femininity in women

We will hold women equally accountable to men and ignore and shun those who refuse it. Thus we force women to behave and act as we wish them to and force them into a complementary position with men instead of a competitive position as is now the case.

Feminine qualities we need from women:
Nurturing
Supportive
Responsibility
Respectfulness
Honesty
3. Limiting government

In order to be independent of society, and live within it, while at the same time work for limiting governmental influence upon our daily lives, men will:
Go Their Own Way
Support other men
Legally reduce any taxpaying
Truthfully act out any duties in accordance with their conscience
Use any rights to the benefit of other men as well as themselves
It is those 3 strategies that come together in one.

MEN GOING THEIR OWN WAY

This is the logo:

Every man supporting this idea is welcome to use the logo in this or similar contexts.

What we do as activism or the way we behave personally are the main tactics.
Use of a logo which symbolizes the strategy.
Run one or many web-sites and fora that promotes this.
Run one or more web-sites which tells the truth about feminism.
Provide stickers, T-shirts, etc., with various statements such as “Chivalry is dead”.
Writing articles supporting our product.
Producing music promoting our product.
Hold international events and local meetings.
Establishing mens clubs.
Boycotting certain products.
You will basically be alone doing this. There is no organization supporting you. You just go your own way and do what you believe is right. You are never obligated beyond your own conscience. True masculinity is also about accepting the rights of other men and not letting them down for any short term personal benefits.

The mens movement does actually cover a much larger picture. By instilling masculinity in others, as well as yourself, you will actually be improving the lives of everybody, including women and children.

IF IT’S NOT RIGHT, GO YOUR OWN WAY!

Take care brother!

1. If she cheats its the mans fault–he somehow made her because something he didnt do

2. If she runs up the credit cards-its his fault because he didnt stop it and its his responsibility to pay it off because he’s her husband.

3. If she has a career he’s expected to support it but she is not required to do anything to support his career except hold her hand out to accept his paycheck every week.

4. If she’s a mental case he’s expected to support her no matter how wacko she is–but if he’s crazy she can leave because how is she suppossed to deal with a crazy ass man

5. If she wants to kick him to the curb it’s her right to date and be with whoever she wants too but if he does the same thing you will see it on the Oprah Winfrey show all about lowlife lying men.

Given this type of environment why in the hell would a man want to get married. I wish someone old would give me flack about my stance on women. I will enjoy telling them off right to their face.

The older generation are the ones who got us all into this mess we are in right now by being too weak to deal with women. Now that is has blown up in men’s faces the same men that caused it all blame it on the current males. What’s worse is you even see idiots of this day and time still getting married.

A MAN GETTING MARRIED TODAY=A SHEEP HEADED FOR THE SLAUGHTERHOUSE.

ProfessorX

The feminists have indeed accomplished their mission; that is to degrade womanhood itself to such an extent as to cause it to appear completely worthless.
Women now fruitlessly expend great energies in an effort to become what they percieve as above them;
The greatest misogyny in western culture immenates not from the lips of men but rather from women who consider their sex as a lower life form and therefore must fruitlessly strive to dicard their very womanhood for masculinity.
In an age that tirelessly proclaims its celebration for ‘diversity’ it has not only failed to succeed in achieving this but has in fact been more oppressive than many previous eras, if not all.
It appears all must be similar/identical to everyone else in order to celebrate ‘diversity’; of course quite the opposite is true.

Jaded Guy;

I hear some talk on this board about being “hard-wired” for sex. I should point out that what seperates us from the male red-butt baboons is ability to think long term and the ability to delay gratification for some higher purpose. It is these qualities that built our civilization as much as keeping females in line and having sex. There is nothing “defective” about a man who overrides his sexual desire for a bigger cause. Let me also say that we are “hardwired” to reproduce, but do we attack the birth control pill? No. So, why are we obligated to do something that we’re “hardwired” to do if it is a liability? The answer is that we are not. The technology is just about there where men can switch their sex drive on and off at will, by the way.

Now the Player is schizophrenic in my opinion. He says on hand: STOP BEING A P@#SY and BE A MAN! STAND UP FOR YOURSELF and then turns right around and says YOU MUST HAVE A RELATIONSHIP WITH A WOMAN! Now, it is doesn’t take a Sherlock to realize who has the power in that situation. The Player admits that when it comes right down to it, he can’t say no to women. Therefore, like the male feminist, he is an enabler for a gynocentric skank culture.

Edit: I can never figure out what the Player is trying to accomplish. Success at one-night stands? But escorts are more economical. Long-term relationships? But player theory only works for attracting the female flame to the male moth. It doesn’t say how to keep from getting burned.

In poker, this is known has having “overplayed one’s hand.” Having fallen for their own bullshit, women have proceeded confident in the fact that no matter how horrible they got, men would still want them and pursue them and keep on trying to live up to their ever-escalating demands. Key to this is the fundamental denial of the role of women in the mating dance - just one more manifestation of the female tendency to be unable to understand the law of cause and effect and instead rely on a magical mode of thinking to explain everything.

Women have simply priced themselves out of the market, and instead of waking up to this fact have simply escalated the intensity of the bile they spewed on men - thus hastening the process.

What is extremely interesting to me to observe is how this is happening in increasingly younger men, and supports your comment about if women had remained even vaguely desirable that they probably could have continued this nonsense indefinitely. Men my age, who still remember a time when decent women existed, have seemed to have a much harder time waking up to how horrible they have become over the past 4 decades. It is a bit like the fact that quitting smoking (or any other addictive drug) is much more difficult than never starting in the first place. Guys who have never become addicted to pussy find it much easier to adjust to a life without it than those who at one point in their lives believed that half or more of everything they could ever earn was a fair trade for a lifetime supply of pussy - even if it was scarce, at least they got some once in a while.

Let me hammer on one of my favorite points one more time - women’s so-called “liberation” will end up liberating men far more than it ever will do anything for women. The entire culture used to be completely set up to deny males any sort of positive identity other than “husband and father” (translation: specialized beast of burden born and bred for the specific purpose of dragging around a financially and emotionally dependent wife and family.) While the stage of destruction of this role as part of destruction of the family has been painful for a lot of men, the ones just behind the “straddle generation” of the boomers are set to reap all the benefits.

Have you ever been in a game of tug-of-war where on a signal all the members of one side simply let go of the rope? The other side simply falls on their asses. That is what is happening right now with women. In this case, the “rope” is the power of pussy and women simply assumed men would be so unwilling to give it up that they could use it to drag men into anything they wanted to, and that men would put up with it no matter how bad it got.

Their fatal miscalculation was not realizing that sex was not the rope which bound men to women, but rather emotional dependency on a stable and intimate relationship. By destroying that part of what women used to offer men, they started to rely on a piece of kite string rather than a rope, and that string is now breaking left and right as men get used to living without it and realize it is not nearly as bad as they were led to believe.

Anyone here remember the old Uncle Remus stories of B’rer Fox and B’rer rabbit? “Please, oh please, oh please don’t throw me into the briar patch!” (giggle giggle, which is actually where I live.)

Women thought that careers and all that were so wonderful and decided they wanted to greedily push us out of them and that we would fight tooth and nail to hold on to them. Surprise! Most jobs suck under the best of circumstances, and now that we no longer have any cultural pressure at all to enslave ourselves to them to support women and children, they are welcome to our old wage-slavery - hope you enjoy it, grrls!

This is the power of men going their own way. Women have stacked the deck so we can do nothing but lose if we try to play their game, and have thus made it easy to choose between “no rewards, all cost” and “no rewards, but no cost, either.”

Silent Bob.

The QuietRebel:

This is why I don’t argue with women. It is useless. It is nothing more than an unecessary waste of energy, thought, and time. Personally, I think you just wasted your evening. Women are SLAVES to their emotions and their ENTIRE life is guided by whatever mood they may be in at any given time. You may have good intentions and think you are “helping” or “educating” women by explaining things clearly and reasonably, but all you are doing is wasting brain cells and oxygen. I have come to believe that most women are INCAPABLE of deep intelligence. They simply do not have the technical mind necessary for rational thought and true reason. It is beyond their grasp. You might as well try explaining Quantum Physics to your dog.

This is one of the reasons why, throughout the history of human civilization, you don’t see many women actually building/engineering/creating/solving anything. They are inept at such things. This is also why I strongly disagree with the idea that women are society’s moral guardians. Women are simply too weak and shallow to understand philosophy, religion, and deep truth. It’s also why I believe women should not be allowed to serve in roles of leadership, either in politics, business, or the Church. Women make miserable men…..period.

The Bible is right…..women ARE the “weaker” sex and it is a harsh truth women refuse to admit. They absolutely cannot stand toe to toe and compete directly with men because they are simply not strong or smart enough to do so. That’s why, by using the Trojan horse of chivalry, women continue to try and get laws passed that weaken men because that is the ONLY way they stand a chance.

Personally, I say let them rot. Let them continue to persue their foolish fantasies. They are fools and I say let them die in their folly. It is not our job to rescue selfish, prideful, arrogant women from themselves. Eventually they (just like men) have to face the consequences of their own thinking and even now, we can clearly see many examples of what happens to them when they do. Look at all the miserable Feminists and how bitter, depressed, and over medicated they have become. They have spent their lives denying what they are and desperately trying to be what they just wish they were…..MEN. Deep down, they know that men are stronger, faster, smarter, and capable of things that women simply cannot do because of their natural limits…..and it pisses them off. They KNOW that men have a natural authority women do not. I’ll even go as far as saying that most westernized women hate themselves because they weren’t born men…….and it’s not your problem!!!

The happiest women I’ve know were the ones who made peace with their femininity, embraced their natural support roles as women, and accepted their place alongside good men. The rest of them will die miserable, rejected, and alone…..

LET THEM!!!

MetaMetaX:

Once you apply antitriad’s theory long enough (I’m getting there…) a couple of things will happen.

First off, you’ll begin to treat women nicely ONLY when you want something from them. And if they give it to you, you keep treating them nicely. But if they don’t, you don’t.

Do THAT long enough, and you’ll realize that this is the same strategy that most women use when dealing with men! Exact same! The only difference is that you as a man will be perfectly competant and successful on your own, while most women will not be.

Then you’ll start to wonder if ANY of the women who have been involved in your life in any way REALLY liked you. This part sucks, as you’re basically going to place your tender feelings memories under the blinding light of truth. Some will fade, but once the pain ends, this moment is shockingly freeing.

Once this all sinks in you’ll discover how stupid most women really are - they mistreat the ONLY entities on the planet that have a chance to make them happy: men, in particular the good and patient ones who theoretically have the capacity to love a woman.

And finally, you’ll have women split in to three categories.

Category One are those that you have a genuine respect and liking for. They have good attitudes and have accomplished something - doesn’t matter what. Maybe one in eight women will fit here.

Category Two are those average women who you KNOW won’t amount to much, but they’re not miserable people. They’re more or less friendly, and they don’t show outward signs of hating you. They evoke your indifference. They’re free to do what they want as long as they stay well away from you. Maybe three in eight women will fit here.

And Category Three are those women who you KNOW won’t amount to much, but holy crap they want to make eveyrone miserable in the process! They deserve your full contempt, and you’ll give it. Ignoring them works best - especially if you play up your niceness to other people. They HATE being ignored, as they hate the fact that they can’t make you miserable.

Once this liberation hits, your life will be yours and yours alone. You’ll live every day by your own terms, think whatever you think is best, and accomplish most of what you set out to do.

But you can’t do this until you realize that most women are irrelevant…

EVERY MAN HERE NEEDS TO COMMIT THIS POST TO MEMORY!!!

NEVER, NEVER, NEVER put yourself at the mercy of a woman! Women CANNOT BE TRUSTED! EVER! I don’t care how “sweet” or “nice” they may seem, a womans attitude, beliefs, and morals are NOT DEPENDABLE. She, as a person, will change with each and every hormonal mood swing. I don’t care if she acts like the wholesome “Girld Next Door”, she is a WOMAN and by her VERY NATURE she is prone to deception, emotional manipulation, and deep-rooted selfishness. Not to mention that most women are liars who put on a good front (like this wench did…) until they think they own you and have you under their control. And for what it’s worth, this is yet another excellent example of why you should NEVER DATE SINGLE MOTHERS!!!

My heart goes out to you PowerChord and you deserve much thanks for sharing your pain so others can learn. But, in my opinion, here is where the VITAL MISTAKE was made:
QUOTE
After a year of being together, she asked me to move in with her, her children, her retarded dog, and two cats. I was hesitant because I felt like I was encroaching upon her domain. She bought the house after much hard work getting out of debt and saving money, and as such I thought maybe I would feel too much like an interloper into her world. After much reassurance from her, I acquiesced and moved in.Granted, you realized your mistake, but it came AFTER it was too late. It was her house, her life, her rules, and you basically gave her authority over you. At least now you’re free….

I wish you the very best man and hope you’ll hang on and not let these selfish women win!

Quiet Rebel
TQR

Here is a range of article created by men that have released themselves from the femimatrix.

Women do not matter. Really - their presence makes not one ounce of difference. They can stand there, sit there, lie there, gesticulate - or not. They can open and close their mouths and make funny sounds or remain silent. It really doesn’t matter. Their sole contribution to the world is popping out kids - an exercise which men have not (yet) mastered.

In fact, the less attention men pay to women, the more they advance. True, they’ll get into a few fights here and there, kill each other off - along with maybe a few hundred thousand others. But all in all, they still manage to advance technologically and evolve humanity. In all this, woman plays no part whatsoever. She might as well not be there, she serves at best as a distraction for men to get into fights over.

Now here comes feminism. It gives women this ludicrous idea that they matter - that their presence somehow makes one iota of a difference when in reality it of course does not. Moreover, it gives men the same ridiculous idea - that they should take woman seriously beyond using them as part of their overall objective (whether that is to have sex or to have a family or whatever).

And THAT’s the source of the problem right there. All of a sudden, men worry about all this senseless shit that women say and do. They actually bother to take women seriously when in reality it not only makes no sense, but it is completely counterproductive. Do you see male animals asking females to fuck them? No, they simply go at it. Sometimes the bitch says no - oh well. On to the next one.

The whole problem is that today, men take women seriously - as if they matter. THAT is why men are unfomfortable - because they are told to think of women as having any significance. Of course the more important something is to you (especially if you’re indoctrinated with the notion), the more seriously you’re going to take it. And when you’re dealing with something as fundamentally irrational and blindly emotional as women, you can see that there’s going to be a problem right there.

Why is Chris so successful with women - and why is he so successful in general, accomplishing shit left and right? Because on a fundamental level he is clear on all this. Now look at his productivity, look at the average entitled ameriwhore’s productivity, and then look at the productivity of the average pussy whipped mangina - and think about who gets shit done and who doesn’t.

The crime against humanity was to brainwash men into thinking that women are to be taken seriously. Even women hate that (though they won’t acknowledge it in the words I just put it).

Antiriad