Feminised Australian Women suck

What an over-rated human being these women think they are. I wondered where or how the single mom was going to get this this type of income.

No wonder they all want to be on their own and spend plenty of time at home with bubby.

Good income if you can get it. I might see if I can get one of these jobs as well.

Amazingly “Job titles new to the list this year include psychologist, laundry machine operator and computer operator”.

Yes it takes a genius to press the button on a washing machine and to plug in a computer which any child over five can do. But it’s worth the inflated women’s rate. And look a “psychologist” does this mean that she will stop saying to the child ” you wait until your Father comes home”.

I don’t think so. What a joke.

Here is one way to cut back the wage bill…….

Stay-At-Home Mom’s ‘Salary’ Rises To $134,121

POSTED: 11:50 am EDT May 5, 2006
UPDATED: 12:00 pm EDT May 5, 2006
WALTHAM, Mass. — The cost of paying a stay-at-home mom for all the work she does is on the rise.

Salary.com said if they got paid, stay-at-home moms would pull down $134,121 this year — a raise of $2,650 from last year’s theoretical salary.

Moms who work outside the home would get an annual paycheck of $86,876 for the “mom job” portion of their work, in addition to their actual “work job” salary.

Salary.com put together a list of job titles that best matched a stay-at-home mom’s definition of the work she does.

Among them — in the order of hours spent per week — are housekeeper, day-care center teacher and cook.

Job titles new to the list this year include psychologist, laundry machine operator and computer operator.

Ah…yes.

We have a different explanation on where these ludicrous figures come from……..

This is another of these so-called “studies” that destroys the meaning. They’re usually performed by voodoo-science graduates, journalism graduates, women’s studies types, or b-school/law graduates that went on the “math-lite” version of the course.

What that excerpt cleverly fails to note is that one of the jobs they are deriving women’s salaries from is CEO.

Moreover, they derived salaries for people working in NYC and area. That definitely represents cost-of-living for the area this “study” is being distributed to. Not.

Yep. Every stay-at-home mom is the equivalent of a Fortune 500 CEO. Brilliant.

Why don’t we have a study that compares stay-at-home women to:
- maid (legal or illegal), typically under minimum wage when you count travel time, even for legals in a big city;
- taxi driver, typically under minimum wage plus tips.
- waitress, under minimum wage plus tips
- laundry worker, minimum wage
- babysitter, under minimum wage
- short order cook, maybe $10-$15/hr; microwaving doesn’t count.
- private under-the-books tutor (typically $10-$15/hr)

All, in all, that sums up to $5 or so an hour. Let’s say $6. So, about $250/wk, $1000/mo, $12000/yr, no napkins required. In fairness, we could add “sex-worker” and miscellaneous for $6000 more /yr for a total of $18000/yr.

Now, we have to compute her benefit package and what she should pay for it, since almost all of those jobs have no benefits.
- Car and fuel provided (usually very good car, $400/mo)
- Housing provided (usually luxuriousm and free run of it, $1000/mo)
- Clothing allowance ($250/mo)
- Medical care ($400/mo)
- Pension ($400/mo)
- life-time job security, even if falls ill ($Priceless, say $500/mo).

So we have 2750/mo in benefits. 33k/year. And I didn’t even add in psychological counselling (listening to her) at $100/hr.

So, 33k-18k = 15k per year that the woman should be PAYING the man!

What a deal for her.

Of course, both of these “studies” are ridiculous, but it’s a game more than just the feminists can play at.

A woman who is willing and happy to stay home and do a good job helping raising children, keeping a home and caring first for the family (as should her husband) is priceless.

There are few in the west, in this decadent age.

-wolfe