Feminised Australian Women suck

Feminist definition: “Sick” –> adj.

1. A man who consistently supports equal legal rights while opposing feminist domination.

2. Someone winning a debate with a feminist.

3. A man who refuses to kowtow to feminism. Usually used as an ad-hominem attack. Translation: “You’re right on, but I won’t admit it.”

Bob’s Truth…………

Well, well, well…………….

Whatever happened to the “superwomen”, the “perfect human” the “whatever a man can do we can do better” or this one I like the most ” women are the world’s greatest communicators”.
We have all heard them rant about that one. The truth is they only communicate it with themselves, we just get the drivel.

But here we have the “WGC” having another communication’s attack.

It really does have a good major whinge, does it not. Cannot help cycling through them, typical female.

Begins with the right sentiments………obviously needs a testosterone shot.

From: Penny Date: 06/02/2004

Subject: the feminine mystique Email: penelope_rice@yahoo.com

Message:

I may be female, but I hate EVERYTHING that is forced on me simply because I have 2 X chromosomes. I hate the obsession with my body, the restrictions in choice of occupation, the lack of autonomy, the powerlessness, and the lack of belonging. I hate the fact that there is no such thing as ’sisterhood’–women will stab each other in the back in a heartbeat if there is a man involved. I hate having to perpetually look like a 21 year old beach bunny. I hate the fact that my entire worth as a human being is defined by whether I am a ‘10′ or just a ‘5′. I hate how judgemental and competitive women are towards one another. I hate how you constantly have to read between the lines whenever you talk to a woman. I hate how women will never give the gods-honest-truth when you ask for it. I hate how the women who get a lot of guys strut around like they are god’s gift to humanity. I hate how weak, immature, and irrational so many women are. I hate how women all over the world allow themselves to be debased and subjugated without so much as a whimper of protest. I hate the whole ‘feminine’ image: a dainty, weak, compliant, emotional, irrational, moody, sex-obsessed, immature, child-like doll whose only goal is to get married and get pregnant with 8 million babies. Bah humbug!

What an over-rated human being these women think they are. I wondered where or how the single mom was going to get this this type of income.

No wonder they all want to be on their own and spend plenty of time at home with bubby.

Good income if you can get it. I might see if I can get one of these jobs as well.

Amazingly “Job titles new to the list this year include psychologist, laundry machine operator and computer operator”.

Yes it takes a genius to press the button on a washing machine and to plug in a computer which any child over five can do. But it’s worth the inflated women’s rate. And look a “psychologist” does this mean that she will stop saying to the child ” you wait until your Father comes home”.

I don’t think so. What a joke.

Here is one way to cut back the wage bill…….

Stay-At-Home Mom’s ‘Salary’ Rises To $134,121

POSTED: 11:50 am EDT May 5, 2006
UPDATED: 12:00 pm EDT May 5, 2006
WALTHAM, Mass. — The cost of paying a stay-at-home mom for all the work she does is on the rise.

Salary.com said if they got paid, stay-at-home moms would pull down $134,121 this year — a raise of $2,650 from last year’s theoretical salary.

Moms who work outside the home would get an annual paycheck of $86,876 for the “mom job” portion of their work, in addition to their actual “work job” salary.

Salary.com put together a list of job titles that best matched a stay-at-home mom’s definition of the work she does.

Among them — in the order of hours spent per week — are housekeeper, day-care center teacher and cook.

Job titles new to the list this year include psychologist, laundry machine operator and computer operator.

Ah…yes.

We have a different explanation on where these ludicrous figures come from……..

This is another of these so-called “studies” that destroys the meaning. They’re usually performed by voodoo-science graduates, journalism graduates, women’s studies types, or b-school/law graduates that went on the “math-lite” version of the course.

What that excerpt cleverly fails to note is that one of the jobs they are deriving women’s salaries from is CEO.

Moreover, they derived salaries for people working in NYC and area. That definitely represents cost-of-living for the area this “study” is being distributed to. Not.

Yep. Every stay-at-home mom is the equivalent of a Fortune 500 CEO. Brilliant.

Why don’t we have a study that compares stay-at-home women to:
- maid (legal or illegal), typically under minimum wage when you count travel time, even for legals in a big city;
- taxi driver, typically under minimum wage plus tips.
- waitress, under minimum wage plus tips
- laundry worker, minimum wage
- babysitter, under minimum wage
- short order cook, maybe $10-$15/hr; microwaving doesn’t count.
- private under-the-books tutor (typically $10-$15/hr)

All, in all, that sums up to $5 or so an hour. Let’s say $6. So, about $250/wk, $1000/mo, $12000/yr, no napkins required. In fairness, we could add “sex-worker” and miscellaneous for $6000 more /yr for a total of $18000/yr.

Now, we have to compute her benefit package and what she should pay for it, since almost all of those jobs have no benefits.
- Car and fuel provided (usually very good car, $400/mo)
- Housing provided (usually luxuriousm and free run of it, $1000/mo)
- Clothing allowance ($250/mo)
- Medical care ($400/mo)
- Pension ($400/mo)
- life-time job security, even if falls ill ($Priceless, say $500/mo).

So we have 2750/mo in benefits. 33k/year. And I didn’t even add in psychological counselling (listening to her) at $100/hr.

So, 33k-18k = 15k per year that the woman should be PAYING the man!

What a deal for her.

Of course, both of these “studies” are ridiculous, but it’s a game more than just the feminists can play at.

A woman who is willing and happy to stay home and do a good job helping raising children, keeping a home and caring first for the family (as should her husband) is priceless.

There are few in the west, in this decadent age.

-wolfe

CYA and abuse at the HREOC.

What goes on in the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission these days is anyone’s guess. But useful work isn’t on the cards it seems. Covering the proverbial backside is though.

Pru Goward, in the job for five years, hasn’t even looked at the abuse of human rights in Tasmania despite numerous alarm calls from Tassie’s High Court Judges, the Law Society and others regarding the abuse of men in the ‘Safe at Home’ Act. The situation there cuts across most of the areas under her remit: Human Rights, Sexual Discrimination, Equal Opportunity.

Now she has a new egregious attack on men to ignore, and boy is she noisily ignoring it. A letter to the Editor of the Herald – Sun pointing out the ‘Chopper’ Read adverts resulting in Pru attacking the messenger.

What ads are these, you ask? It seems that a shadowy group calling itself the Schwartz Foundation has hired the notorious psychopath-murderer, Mark ‘Chopper’ Read, to tell us all that men sent to jail for offenses against women will get seven shades of you know what beaten out of them. The ads have been screened and quickly taken off but only because of the criticism. SBS has a copy and has run for cover. The Salvation Army was quick off the mark in the Courier-Mail with its condemnation and researchers at the University of Queensland reckoned it might ‘backfire’. I’ll say. It is now singing the backside of the lazy arses in HREOC.

The HREOC was set up to guarantee the UN’s Universal Human Rights Charter to which Australia is a signatory. One paragraph in that august Charter deals specifically with the treatment of prisoners and their protection from violence and here is an ad on TV promoting and advocating just such illegal violence. The advert itself is illegal.

Pru Goward tried to shoot the messenger via the Herald Sun however and evaded the issue by saying it was a private sector matter. Even Julie Bishop, the Minister Assisting the Prime Minister got in on the act – in a letter to Tasmania’s Mercury newspaper - pointing the finger away from the Government. Maybe it did originate in some private initiative as they want us to believe but in the public mind it is associated with the other long-running anti-male advertising underwritten by $73 million of taxpayers money, ‘Australia says No to violence against Women’. Violence against men does not seem to bother the Sexual Discrimination Commissioner. Private initiative or not, it advocates illegality and Pru polishes her pointy nails to scratch the face of a man who draws her attention to it.

She tries to ignore the alerts just as her fellow femonazi, Tassie’s ex Attorney General the notoriously sexist Judy Jackson did. “Its only men�. Meanwhile a complaint against Pru has arrived at the HREOC so she now has to investigate herself! Amongst the many questions in the official complaint that Pru needs to give a public answer to are:

Who are the Schwartz Foundation? Is it an Australian or foreign body?

Why are they advocating illegal actions in Australian Government Institutions? Why are they allowed to do this?

What is the Office you work in going to do about them? Prosecute or not? If not, why not?

Why has the Sexual Discrimination Commissioner, Pru Goward, not acted to uncover them, instead of using her power to abuse a member of the public?

What is Julie Bishop, the Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Women’s Issues doing in all this?

Why is there no Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Men’s Issues? The absence of this role is rank sexual discrimination.

Why hasn’t Pru Goward investigated the Sexual Discrimination in the Prime Minister’s Office?

Why has Pru Goward attacked a private citizen for raising the issue?

Why has the Office failed to investigate the abuses of human rights in Tasmania?

The Chief Justice of Tasmania, the Head of the Law society, several Judges and many citizens have protested the ‘Safe at Home’ Act which denies natural justice, bail, evidence of crime, and demands mandatory arrest and incarceration of men by a hampered police force, only to be dismissed by a sexist Attorney General who is on public record as saying she will take no notice because the complainers “are only men�. This sexist injustice seems to have been ignored by the Sexual Discrimination Commissioner, Pru Goward.

Why?

It will be interesting to see if this poor sap who raised the issue gets discriminated against by the anti-discrimination mob.

The same female has accused other males as well and has not paid any penalty for lying and incarcerating a human being under a false pretence.
Some of the laws this lying female has broken would be perjury, as far as I am aware this is a punisable crime if your a male. Obviously not if your a female.

Teacher Cleared Of Rape A teacher who died in prison after being convicted of raping one of his pupils has been posthumously cleared by the Court of Appeal.

It all boiled down to one girl’s word against his, and the jury believed her.

Once again, never fall for the shameful lie perpetually perpetrated by dishonest self-serving western government officials and by their corrupt cronies in the judiciary that their systems of justice are based on the notion that men are deemed to be innocent of a crime until proved otherwise.

Proof is no longer required in cases of ‘abuse’. A single accusation alone - without further evidence - is all that is required to send a man to prison or to have him removed from his own home.

And please do not believe the nonsense that miscarriages of justice like the one above are the fault of the juries. The judges in these cases have the power to throw them out of court on the basis of insufficient evidence to warrant a trial. But, in a nutshell, they are just too self-serving and just too corrupt to do this.

It also emerged that the girl, now 26, made similar allegations against another man, whose CONVICTION was quashed earlier this year.

This is the type of articles that has endless possibilities. Imagine having an android instead of a female at home. No more complaining, no endless harping about any topic that you can think of, no getting screwed when trading it in for another model.
Having someone inthe house that actually does not think the world evolves around it, bliss.

It warms the cockles of my heart.

Korean Scientists Develop Female Android

By Kim Tae-gyu

A child touches the female android named EveR-1 during an exhibition at the Seoul Education Culture Center, Thursday. /Yonhap
Standing 1.6 meters tall and weighing about 50 kilograms, she can understand others, speak, blink with her eyes and makes several facial expressions.

Here’s an earlier version. But it was rejected.

The idea of this newspaper is to spread the word. This copy will print out to one A4 page and will be ideal to glue onto a toilet door or window or post or anywhere where men will see it.

We believe that every male should shovel some gravel, as the saying goes. Make some effort and do something for the Men’s movement so we can at least get back some dignity.

It’s up to you, print out just ten copies and stick them somewhere. It will at least make you feel involved and made an effort to spread the word. If you made the effort then your An MRA. (Men’s Rights Activist) Congratulation, well done.

Australian Men’s Newspaper,A4 size for copying and nailing anywhere to get exposure

I have highlighted the best bits, I’ll wait till I stop laughing…..

Here the other best part “It is also keen for cheerleaders to be seen as athletes in sports wear, rather than bimbos in bikinis.”

Ha,ha,haaaaaaaaahahaha……….

Athletes….MMaaahhhaaaa!!!!!!!

Cheerleaders ordered to cover up
By Hannah Davies
April 16, 2006

Queensland Reds cheer leaders … Jasmine, Taryn and Bec (r) - only Bec would have to wrap that midriff, according to Gymnastics Australia / file

SCANTILY-clad cheerleaders have been ordered to cover up because of fears they may be encouraging schoolgirl anorexia.
Cheerleading’s governing body Gymnastics Australia is banning teams from baring their midriffs and has given them until the end of the year to find new uniforms.

The organisation believes the revealing costumes make sensitive teenagers feel uncomfortable about their weight and “affect the self-esteem of others”.

It is also keen for cheerleaders to be seen as athletes in sports wear, rather than bimbos in bikinis.

This has angered cheerleading squads who say audiences don’t want a cover-up.

Brisbane Broncos cheerleaders’ manager Anthony Ikin, whose squad is not affected by the ban, described it as “ridiculous and way too extreme”.

“The midriff is not an area to be concerned about exposing … no one wants to go to a game and see people in tracksuits and baggy clothes, it’s not appealing .”

Broncos cheerleader Angeli Chupungco, 21, said she was happy wearing the uniform of a sports top and shorts with stockings. “The outfits are appropriate for what we’re doing and we look the way people want us to look as cheerleaders.”

The ban, which has already been imposed in the United States, will affect teams which are registered with Gymnastics Australia or compete at their events.

This covers 33 Queensland clubs including Logan’s Acrobatics Fanatics, Townsville Dance and Cheerleading, and Cheersport, which has squads in Brisbane and Townsville.

The ban follows the Queensland Reds cheerleaders being forced to cover up and tone down their moves after their revealing bikinis led to complaints from rugby fans.

Gymnastics Australia national cheerleading program manager Nerine Cooper defended the ban, saying it was important to bear in mind that “cheerleading is for family viewing”.

“We don’t want girls to feel under pressure to lose weight because of the uniforms, and we also don’t want girls who see cheerleaders developing self-esteem issues which can lead to anorexia,” she said.

[b]”We also want the cheerleaders to be seen as athletes, not bimbos in uniforms which are too brief.”

Counsellor Alan Spencer, who runs the Gold Coast Eating Disorders Association, said cheerleaders were role models.

“Scantily dressed cheerleaders do contribute to some girls developing anorexia,” he said.

“These cheerleaders are adored by the population and some teenagers see all the love and attention they get and they think they are not measuring up.

“They think if only they could just have their body then people would love them, too.”[/b]

It would seem that it’s just fine to introduce a knifeholder called “all Men are Bastards” knife holder, but what about this one ?

Are we offended yet…………

Wommyns studies is just another excuse for women to get together and work on their already over-bloated victim complex. The only complex that ensures copious amounts of government funding. Billions in fact.

The privilidged princess can get away with anything in Australia, murder is just minor compared with the daily event of being arse-raped by the Family Court system here.

Women licensed to kill by Australian courts
7 March 2006

Another woman has walked free from an Australian court after murdering her husband. Not only was it murder, it was, according to the prosecution, a cold-blooded and calculated execution.

On 30 September 2004, primary school teacher, Claire Margaret MacDonald, 39, put on a camouflage outfit and rubber gloves, grabbed her husband’s high powered rifle and hid in the bushes near where the family’s Land Rover was parked in a paddock on the couple’s property in Acheron in Victoria, and waited for her husband to arrive.

She lured him to the spot by telling him the Land Rover’s battery was flat. She loaded five bullets into the magazine and kept a sixth in her pocket. After about 90 minutes Warren MacDonald came into view. Clair MacDonald followed him in the rifle’s telescopic sights until he was about 45 metres away. She fired one shot then another and another until she had fired all five rounds. Warren MacDonald fell to the ground, struck in the neck, throat and back. She then took out the sixth bullet from her pocket, loaded it and fired.

As her husband lay bleeding to death on the ground, MacDonald stood over him and berated him for five minutes, telling him how she “hated him for making me do this”.

MacDonald then tried to cover up her crime by telling police that a rabbit-shooter had threatened her husband the previous day.

Only when police began questioning her children did MacDonald change her story and claim she was a battered wife.

“He was hurting my children and he just didn’t deserve to live. I just wanted him out of my life, out of my children’s lives”, MacDonald told police.

During the trial in the Victorian Supreme Court, MacDonald’s defence counsel, James Montgomery, told the jury how Mr MacDonald had “totally dominated” his family, and in particular his wife, through “physical, verbal, psychological and sexual intimidation”. Unfortunately the allegations could not be tested in court as Mr MacDonald was not around to refute or challenge them.

After deliberating for a day, the jury found Claire Margaret MacDonald not guilty on the charge of murder. Amazingly, they also found her not guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter. In acquitting Mrs MacDonald, the jury accepted the defence argument that she killed her husband in self-defence.

The MacDonald case is just one of a number of recent cases where a wife has got away with murdering her husband on the grounds of being a battered wife. Why bother having women’s refuges and a myriad of taxpayer funded support agencies? Why not just issue high-powered rifles to all women who claim to be battered?

http://www.australian-news.com.au/Claire_MacDonald.htm

Outragious, another “women are really just victims, really” situation. Quiet rightly the people involved as really annoyed at the favouritism shown to women child abusers.

Anger at sex teacher’s light sentence

March 2, 2006 - 2:27PM

South Australian Premier Mike Rann has called for a report into the suspended sentence given to a teacher who had sex with her 15-year-old student.

The decision not to jail music teacher Bridget Mary Nolan, 25, has sparked widespread outrage, with the teenage victim’s family questioning whether a male teacher would have been treated with such leniency.

Nolan had admitted having sex three times with the boy, who was a student at the country SA school where she worked, last year.

She had faced a maximum seven years’ imprisonment for each of the three convictions for unlawful sexual intercourse, but the SA District Court yesterday suspended a two year jail term after Nolan entered a $1,000, three-year good behaviour bond.

Judge Gordon Barrett said Nolan’s sacking as a teacher, and the considerable media publicity given to her case, had already served as considerable punishment.

“I am entitled to take into account the extent of shame you have already suffered,” he said.

“You have lost your posting and will, in all likelihood, lose your career.

“While that is inevitable, it is, in your case a significant penalty.”

Judge Barrett also noted Nolan, who was depressed after a break-up with her boyfriend at the time, was genuinely remorseful for her crime.

Last year, country SA teacher Kym Slater was jailed after he admitted having sex with two female students.

In Melbourne, physical education teacher Karen Ellis was initially given a suspended sentence for having sex with a student, but was later jailed after an appeal.

Ellis served six months’ jail before she was released last November.

The family of Nolan’s victim today criticised the decision not to jail her.

“Similar cases involving teachers and students where there have been a male perpetrator and a female victim have resulted in a jail term,” the family said in a statement.

They also questioned the extent of Nolan’s depression: “Our understanding of depression has led us to believe it usually causes a loss of libido.”

SA Director of Public Prosecutions Stephen Pallaras said he would view a prosecutor’s report before deciding whether to appeal.

Premier Mike Rann also said he would seek a report on the case.

“This was an incredible breach of trust,” Mr Rann said.

“This teacher will never teach again and should never teach again.”

This is the “Preferred Employer” for the “Office for Feminists” sorry Wommyn, want to know why ?

% OF FEMALE EMPLOYEES = 91%

Obviously women are more “equal” than anyone else……

Sexism aquires a new meaning when applied to the sexist “Office for wommin” in Australia.

Billions of dollars in funds is not enough, women superiority is the goal.

Warrigal Care
EOWA asked Warrigal Care, to explain some of their initiatives and workplace programs instigated to achieve equal opportunity in the organisation, and why they are committed to
being an ‘EOWA Employer of Choice for Women’ (EOCFW).
Organisation Information
INDUSTRY SECTOR = Aged Care
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES = 524
% OF FEMALE EMPLOYEES = 91%
% OF FEMALE SENIOR MANAGEMENT = 20% Executive Level
77% Middle Management
Q Why are you committed to becoming an EOCFW?
Warrigal Care is committed to being an employer of choice for women, as we believe in promoting
the best qualities in our people,

http://www.eowa.gov.au/case_studies/_docs/eocfw_profile_03_warrigal.pdf

Even though the sexist Office for women banned males from the International Women’s Day Function.
The Australian Government and the state governments are cow-towing.

Grovelling for the female vote.

“Women” do not want “equal opportunity”; they are only interested in “women’s supremacyâ€?.

The Office for Women in Australia is not one that will go short of MONEY, that’s for sure. Their greed and avarice denies hospitals and education for children, little harmless children are denied a proper education and the elderly are rejected by hospitals due to lack of funds and here’s why…..

April 2003

The speech by the Senator Amanda Vanstone, Minister for Women’s Interests announced the 2001-2002 Budget, Highlights for Women.

In this speech to parliament the minister outlined 2.74 billion dollars of spending from the federal budget.

- $30 million over four years willl be spent on Office of the Status of Women.

- $2.4 million over four years forr national leadership Initiative for women

- $5.5 million over four years to expand women’s organisations

- $5.5 million over four years to develop women’s information strategy

- $16.5 million over four years too combat sexual assault

- $4.2 million over four years to enhance equal opportunity for women in workplace

- $115.6 million over four years oon women’s health programs

- $71.9 million over four years foor GP’s to increase rates of cervical screening

- $13.5 million over four years too improve the access to undergraduate nursing education in country

- $8 Billion over four years on Childcare

- $35 million over four years to eencourage women in technology, science and innovation

The selfish sex knows no limits. More money, while more males die from more diseases than women, die more from cancer than women and a suicide rate of 7 males a day and men’s death from prostate cancer is 6 per day. Where is the aid or assistance from the government.

You’re joking right ! Men get nothing.

Women don’t care as long it does not affect them.

The 2005-2006 Federal Government Budget.

Making Australia Stronger — Delivering Our Commitments 2005-06
Million
72 Women’s Leadership and Development Program 4.1
73 Women’s Safety Agenda 15.2

88 – Breast Cancer Network Australia 0.3

91 – National Breast Ca.ãer Centre 0.8

HEALTH AND AGEING (continued)

additional amount Million
73 Women’s Safety Agenda 1.0

HUMAN SERVICES
73 Women’s Safety Agenda 0.2

Capital
Health Insurance Commission
73 Women’s Safety Agenda 0.1

Women’s Leadership and Development Programme
2005-06
Department of Family and Million
Community Services 4.1

Women’s Safety Agenda
The Government will provide $75.7 million over four years (including $0.1 million in
capital funding) for the Women’s Safety Agenda,

The measure will provide funding for the continuation of the Violence Against
Women: Australia Says No campaign, training of General Practice nurses in regional
and rural areas and training for Mensline counsellors on domestic violence issues.

Investing in Stronger Regions — practice nurses in rural areas

The Government will provide $17.8 million (including $0.9 million of resourcing and
$0.1 million of capital funding in 2004-05) over five years to fund a new Medicare item
allowing practice nurses in rural areas to undertake a wider range of procedures,
including pap smears and other preventive health checks for women. This measure
commenced on 1 January 2005.
The measure will help to provide rural women with the same opportunity to choose a
female practitioner as is available to women in metropolitan areas. The measure will
also assist in reducing waiting times to see a GP in many rural communities.

Strengthening Cancer Care — Breast Cancer Network Australia

The Government will provide $1.0 million over four years to support the development
of the Breast Cancer Network Australia, which will assist with the further
development and dissemination of resources to help women newly diagnosed with
breast cancer.

Strengthening Cancer Care — National Breast Cancer Centre

The Government will provide an additional $4.0 million over five years (including
$0.8 million in 2004-05) to the National Breast Cancer Centre, to support improved
quality of care, raise awareness about early detection, and identify improved
approaches to the early detection and management of breast cancer.

Strengthening Cancer Care — quitting smoking during pregnancy
The Government will provide $4.3 million over three years to encourage doctors,
health workers and midwives to give advice to pregnant women

Women’s Leadership and Development Programme

The Government will provide $15.0 million over four years for the Women’s Leadership and Development Programme to encourage greater female participation in all parts of Australian life, including leadership roles.

The programme’s activities will include supporting the appointment of women to Australian Government and public company boards, developing a young women’s leadership and mentoring programme in rural and remote areas, increasing women’s participation in all aspects of sport and providing grants to non-government national women’s organisations.

Working Women/Women in Business

• $2.0 million over the period 2004–05 to 2007–08 to deliver approximately 50 home-based business seminars and setting up home-based business clubs in regional locations;
• introduction of a new Mature Age Worker Tax Offset for workers aged 55 and over;
• $15 million over three years, commencing 2005-06, for the Industry Partnerships Program including industry capacity building initiatives and facilitation of women’s leadership and skill development for the agriculture, fisheries and forestry industries;
• $14 million over five years from 2006–07 to 2010–2011 for Backing Australia’s Ability:
Building Our Future Through Science and Innovation, including support for women
through grants, scholarships and access to agribusiness development learning tools;
• enhancements to the simplified taxation system to assist small business; and
• $50 million over the period 2004–05 to 2006–07 for the Regulation Reduction Incentive
Fund to further encourage the local government sector to introduce reforms that benefit
home-based businesses.

Indigenous Women and Housing
• $102.8 million over four years to maintain the real value and improve the effectiveness of the Australian Government’s Indigenous housing investments.

NATIONAL DEPRESSION INITIATIVE, BEYONDBLUE

How much of these funds will be spent on males ?

Depression is a leading cause of illness and disability. It is a major health issue for women in particular. More than 500,000 adult Australian women experience depressive illness each year, over 60 per cent of all sufferers. Around 7.4 per cent of Australian women experience depression. One in ten young women aged 18 to 24 years is significantly affected.

The Healthy for Life Program provides $102.4 million over four years to improve the health of Indigenous mothers, babies and children,

Depression is a leading cause of illness and disability. It is a major health issue for women in particular. More than 500,000 adult Australian women experience depressive illness each year, over 60 per cent of all sufferers. Around 7.4 per cent of Australian women experience depression. One in ten young women aged 18 to 24 years is significantly affected.

$52.2 million over four years (commencing in 2004–05) was announced by the
Minister for Ageing in February 2005, for dementia research, new dementia management
services, improved training of health professionals and new tools and guidelines to help
GPs, as well as prevention and early intervention initiatives.

Communication
Through a range of activities the Australian Government will continue to showcase and
celebrate the achievements of Australian women. This will occur through staging major
events, such as International Women’s Day, and maintaining a range of publications,
and websites that provide useful information to women.

Mom’s Make Lousy Dads

by Burt Prelutsky

One of the more fatuous beliefs that has been foisted off by self-proclaimed feminists and other politically correct lamebrains is that children don’t really need fathers. I used to say that American women, thanks to increased salaries and well-stocked sperm banks, had reached a point where they only needed men to open ketchup bottles and get stuff down from high shelves. Ladies, I was joking!

I had no idea that so many women took the line to heart. Thanks to my good joke and Gloria Steinem’s bad one – that crack about fish needing bicycles – women have become increasingly wacky. What is really surprising, considering that thirty years of feminist propaganda has promoted the natural superiority of females, is how masculine, in the worst sense of the word, women have become. Surely I am not the only person who has noticed that these days young women are just as likely as men to smoke, to get bombed on booze and cuss in public, and perhaps even likelier to drive like maniacs and to flip you off for daring to share the road with them.

In the business world, far too many women salivate at the thought of being regarded as cold and ruthless. They are every bit as likely to torment and humiliate their employees, and to promote an atmosphere of fear and anger, especially among their female underlings. Call these women cut-throat and they think you’re trying to sweet talk them.

Perhaps it’s simply a case of Stockholm syndrome gone amuck. As you probably know, that’s a situation in which hostages come to identify, not with their rescuers, but with their captors. Women, in their own defense, might possibly claim that they’d been powLless for so long that it was inevitable that they’d take on the very characteristics they’ve despised. But that’s a load of hooey. I say, if you’re going to behave like an idiot and a bully, don’t make excuses for your boorishness. God knows men don’t! Inasmuch as more and more women are eager to hand off their offspring to a nanny, a granny or a nursery school, you have to wonder why most of them even bother giving birth. All they seem to have to show for the experience are stretch marks. In a society that is determined to accept the nutty notion that two gay men or a pair of lesbians are just as likely – they really mean likelier – to raise a normal, healthy child as a married man and woman, how could anybody dare suggest that a single woman isn’t equally capable? Well, she isn’t. This is especially true when the child is a boy. No matter how hard she tries, no matter how much she cares, no matter how many broken nails she’s willing to sacrifice in order to play catch with the kid, the bottom line is she’s a woman. And just because so many of the morons in Hollywood have turned single motherhood into just another fad, sort of like collagen lips and plastic bosoms, doesn’t make it a good idea.

It simply makes sense that a boy needs a man in his life to act as a role model, to show him not only how to curb his temper and to temper his testosterone, but also how to avoid being feminized into something resembling a well-dressed eunuch. The point I am looking to make I saw made perfectly in a segment of a TV magazine show some years ago. It seems that in Africa, on a game preserve, the rangers were discovering the mutilated carcasses of several rhinos. They couldn’t determine who was responsible for the carnage, and they couldn’t imagine a motive. After conducting an investigation, they found to their amazement that a band of teenage elephants were killing the rhinos for no other reason than that they felt like it. It was their version of drive-by shootings. Like our own urban gangs, the young rogues even had a leader.

The rangers thought long and hard about the problem. The first thing they realized was that the teenagers were free to make up their own evil rules of behavior because, like the blood-thirsty kids in “Lord of the Flies,� there were no adults in their world. All the bull elephants had been slaughtered by poachers for their ivory. Then, because they didn’t have to answer to politicians or social workers, the rangers did two essential things. First, having determined he was incorrigible, they killed the leader of the pack. Next, they flew in several bull elephants. In no time at all, order was restored. The big guys let it be known that if there was any more rhino-stomping, there would be hell to pay. Their message was short and sweet; namely that elephants don’t behave that way.

So, for all their professional advances, there are still a few things that women simply can’t do as well as men. Some of those things, such as throwing a football forty yards in a perfect spiral or crushing a beer can on their forehead, aren’t all that essential. Important, I’ll grant you, but not absolutely essential to society at large. However, when it comes to rearing male children, we’d all probably be better off if the ladies simply dropped the kids off in the woods for wolves to raise.

Burt Prelutsky

The New Wommin.

THE PATHOLOGY OF THE FEMALE-HEADED FAMILY

“Women,” wrote Ramsey Clark in l970, in his celebrated book Crime in America, “are not a threat to the public.” But he also wrote, in discussing the male juvenile criminals who are a threat to the public, that “three-fourths came from broken homes.” That means mostly female-headed homes. That means that while the single mothers of these criminals do not themselves commit crimes and go to prison, the socialization they give their children has an extraordinarily high correlation with the male crime of the next generation. This socialization, in fact, is the “root cause of crime” which Clark wrote his book to explore. He had found the explanation he sought and he didn’t know it. It was concealed by the generation-long time-lag between cause and effect and by the sex-switch between generations: like hemophilia, crime is manifested in males but carried and transmitted by females–or rather by single females. Instead of seeing the true connection, Clark gave his readers this:

If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what must be seen is the dehumanizing effect on the individual of slums, racism, ignorance and violence, of corruption and impotence to fulfill rights, of poverty and unemployment and idleness, of generations of malnutrition, of congenital brain damage and prenatal neglect, of sickness and disease, of pollution, of decrepit, dirty, ugly, unsafe, overcrowded housing, of alcoholism and narcotics addiction, of avarice, anxiety, fear, hatred, hopelessness and injustice. These are the fountainheads of crime.

Not so. If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what must be seen is its relationship with the female-headed family. Most criminals come from female-headed families. Most gang members come from female-headed families. Most addicts come from female-headed families. Most rapists come from female-headed families. Most educational failures come from female-headed families. Every presidential assassin before Hinckley came from a female-headed family or one in which he had an impossibly bad relationship with his father. Most illegitimate births occur to females who themselves grew up in female-headed families.

The Garbage Generation

The Marriage No-Shows
July 14, 2004
by Carey Roberts

This week Washington lawmakers took up the historical debate on the Federal Marriage Amendment. But the good Senators appear to be blissfully unaware of the trend that overshadows the controversies surrounding gay marriage — the fact that millions of American men are marital no-shows.

Stripped down to its bare essentials, marriage is an enduring social contract between a consenting man and woman. Before they agree to enter into this sacred union, both parties must have the expectation of benefit. But the disturbing fact is, millions of American men have come to believe that marriage is a losing proposition.

News of the Marriage Strike first began to settle into our national consciousness in 2002. That year Barbara Dafoe Whitehead and David Popenoe of Rutgers University interviewed 60 men to probe their attitudes about marriage. And to their surprise, they discovered that some of these men were flat-out opposed to tying the knot.

So this year, the Rutgers researchers decided to launch a full-scale national survey of single heterosexual men, ages 25-34. These men represent almost 10 million of the nation’s most eligible bachelors. The report was just released last month.

Among those men, 53% said they were not interested in getting married anytime soon - the marriage delayers. That figure alone is cause for concern.

But this is the statistic that every American who wants to strengthen and protect marriage should be worried about: 22% of the men said they had absolutely no interest in finding their Truly Beloved. The report described these guys as “hardcore marriage avoiders.”

When almost one-quarter of single men in their prime courting years - that’s two million potential husbands - declare a Marriage Strike, we’re facing an unprecedented social crisis.

Why are these men refusing to marry? Some of their reasons are spelled out in the 2002 report:
· “Some men express resentment towards a legal system that grants women the unilateral right to decide to terminate a pregnancy. There is also a mistrust of women who may ‘trap’ men into fathering a child by claiming to be sterilized, infertile or on the pill.”
· “Many men also fear the financial consequences of divorce.They fear that an ex-wife will ‘take you for all you’ve got’ and that ‘men have more to lose financially than women’ from a divorce.”

Men’s fear of financial ruin following divorce is backed by research. In a soon-to-be-released book, Sanford Braver, PhD of Arizona State University notes that noncustodial fathers often spend considerable money when they are with their kids. But the child support guidelines don’t take this into account.

Plus, the custodial mother reaps a number of tax benefits, such as being able to list the kids as exemptions on her IRS return. Likewise, the mother does not pay any taxes on her child support income, while the father cannot list these payments as deductions. As a result, Braver suggests that the “guidelines have already become too generous” to the point that the father experiences a standard of living that is lower than his ex-wife.

Men have other reasons to resist the romantic urge. Domestic violence laws allow vindictive women to kick hubby out of the house based on the flimsiest of pretexts. And if divorce were to result, he would likely lose custody of his own flesh and blood.

Four decades ago, radical feminists, taking their cue from Marxist-Leninist theory, decreed that marriage was nothing more than gender slavery. Claiming to speak on behalf of American women, feminists set out to radically rework - or even do away with — the age-old social contract of marriage. And women, mesmerized by the ephemeral promise of liberation and empowerment, opted to go along for the ride.

Now, feminists are succeeding beyond their wildest dreams. And women are left to wonder why their Prince Charming is nowhere to be found.

Schoolgirls getting more violent
By Bruce McDougall
feb06

GIRLS are taking knives into class, assaulting teachers and committing brutal robberies in a disturbing upsurge of hardcore violence by female students.

Teenage girls have threatened to stalk and even bomb people, to physically harm school principals and have enlisted gangs to carry out revenge attacks, The Daily Telegraph can reveal.

The frightening situation emerged as NSW remained in shock after the brutal bashing murder of taxi driver Youbert Hormozi - allegedly by two 14-year-old girls.

Victims of female assault have been hospitalised and police called to schools when violence has surged out of control, Education Department documents obtained under Freedom of Information show.

And in a worrying trend, parents increasingly are becoming involved in their children’s school disputes.

Mr Iemma recognised the problem was as much with girls as boys yesterday, saying: “The need to teach respect to young people is not gender specific … it is no longer a case of needing to focus on angry young males.”

Putting the onus on parents, he added: “We need strong role models and direction for boys and girls and it needs to start in the home.”

Psychologist Michael Carr-Gregg said one of the most profound motivations for girls trying to “outbloke the blokes” in violence was the desire for male attention.

“If she believes she’s in competition with another chick for a guy’s affections, she’ll resort to violence for male attention by adopting more overtly aggressive behaviour,” he said.

Mr Carr-Gregg said nasty video games, reality TV and rock videos suggested “girl power was sex power” and sent destructive messages to teens.

“Young people, if they don’t have good role models, will allow Hollywood educate them about what it means to be male or female,” he said. “Many of our kids are growing in a psychological wasteland … it’s teaching kids the only way to solve problems is through violence.”

There is little Australian research into the nature and extent of adolescent female violence but international evidence points to a startling rise.

In one incident recorded in school files, four teenage females in Sydney’s southwest assaulted and robbed two female students, taking their money, watches and phones.

No jail for mother who had teen’s baby
March 10, 2006 - 11:29AM

A mother of 10 who had sex with her son’s 14-year-old friend and later had his baby has avoided jail.

Cheryl Whittle, then 31, sexually assaulted the boy while he was sleeping over at her home in Werribee, Victoria, in 1992.

She crept into her son’s room, performed oral sex on his friend and then had intercourse with the boy, who later went outside and vomited.

Whittle gave birth to his child - a boy now aged 12 - on March 11, 1993.
Her victim, now 27, was harassed for child-care payments, the Victorian County Court was told.

He did not report the abuse until December 2004.

“I felt disgusted and betrayed at the time of the sexual assault and shocked, stressed and horrified by the prospect of becoming a father,” he told police.

Whittle pleaded guilty to one count of sexually penetrating a child aged under 16. The maximum sentence for the offence is 10 years’ prison.

Today, Judge Geoffrey Chettle sentenced Whittle to 15 months’ jail, wholly suspended for three years.

“But for the delay in this case, you would be going to prison,” he said.
“You stole his innocence.”

Justice Chettle said that had genders in the case been reversed he would have imposed the same punishment.

GRAVITY HOLDS WOMEN DOWN!

It’s time to discuss the extra burden that gravity places on women, says Colleen Hyphenated-Lastname, president of the Propaganda Organization for Women.
“Feminist scientists on an archaeological dig in Mesopotamia have discovered illustrations of women who seem to be floating in the air,” Hyphenated-Lastname says. “This cutting-edge research indicates that there once was a time when gravity did not exist. In fact, these artifacts indicate that society was once gender equal, and women held most high offices of power and controlled the television remote.”

“But all this changed with the onset of western patriarchal societies that wanted to keep women down. If there were no distinctions between men and women, patriarchal oppressors had to invent them. And if there was no gravity, the patriarchy had to invent that, too.”

“Gravity is designed to benefit men, who have thicker bones and greater upper-body strength. Today, we see the results everywhere of the patriarchy’s efforts to keep women down. Gravity causes women to fall to their deaths out of windows or down stairs. It makes buildings collapse, killing women and children. It damages women’s cars when some inconsiderate construction worker topples from the tenth floor and bounces off the hood. Gravity makes the complete, leather-bound editions of Carrie Chapman Catt fall off my bookshelf and give me such a smack I can hardly see straight.”

“Navy pilot Kara Hultgreen would not have crashed her jet except for gravity. Clearly, she was set up to fail.”

“Women seek treatment for depression at far higher rates. Obviously, more women are feeling ‘down.’ Gravity is just another way in which women’s health is being shortchanged.”

“This oppression is historical, the product of white, western men who wanted to hold onto power. The laws of physics were written long before women had the right to vote. If women had had more input, the laws of physics would have been kinder, and gravity would have been supportive. Instead, we are shackled with the competitive, conflict-oriented mode of men. Isaac Newton, a typical dead white European male, was obsessed with ‘opposing’ reactions, even if he hypocritically admitted that some of them were equal. When he declared that for every action there is opposed an equal reaction, he was doing nothing less than defining the backlash. If women had had a chance to shape these laws, their conflict-free style of interaction would have made sure that there were no opposed reactions. All reactions simply would have been equal.”

“We can undo the oppressive, patriarchal mindset that would have us believe that gravity really represents the ‘natural’ order of things,” says Hyphenated-Lastname. “It will require spending money on programs to elevate girls’ self esteem so that they are not held down by artificial concepts of patriarchy.”

“This will cost a lot of money,” says Hyphenated-Lastname.

“But I’m up for that.”

- posted by Sir Jessy of Anti @ 11:22 AM